Saturday, August 9th, brings us The Two Koreas and Gentleman Reg.

The Two Koreas

The Two Koreas are one of my new favourite bands that I’ve never seen live. Their new E.P. “Sessions EP” is fantastic. They are (self-dubbed) Toronto’s preeminent practitioners of jangular electric beat muzik. I’m not sure what that means, but, I think they may be right. (which is also why I like them)

Click here to listen to Withering Heights, by The Two Koreas


Gentleman Reg

Gentleman Reg is the newest member of the Arts and Crafts Label (see Broken Social Scene, Feist, Stars, etc). It’s not difficult to see why. His song writing and presence is both at once gentle while equally, and sometime alarmingly provocative. His new album is coming, and advance buzz is that it’s marvelous.


Hello friends and lovers.

I want to take this time to start introducing you to the music at this year’s festival. We’ve got an INCREDIBLE line-up. When I say incredible, I mean, INCREDIBLE. Each and every one of these bands were on our “if only we could get <blank>” list at the beginning of the festival. And to our great joy, we’ve had an unprescendented series of “yes” responses, that have resulted in this beautiful line-up. Great credit is due to Evan Newman, who founded the Beaudelaire Label, and whose skills, reputation and respect helped us book most of these bands. The reputation of the SummerWorks Festival is also a major reason that so many of these artists have responded. This is the beginning of something really exciting, and we hope you’ll catch some music at the end of the day.

The first show is Matt Barber and Bob Wiseman. This is an really cool pairing.

Matt Barber is known for his ability to turn a room into a bit of a sanctuary. He’s a great songwriter who’s recently decided to go more intimate, leaving Warner Music for the Outside Music Label.

Starting off the night is Bob Wiseman. Many if not all of you already know Bob Wiseman. He is one-part genius, one-part mad man, one-part show-man. He’s as famous as is he infamous. So much can be said, but nothing can really match the experience of a Bob Wiseman show. He’s a glorious weirdo. You don’t want to miss this.

DOOM 2012: WHEN WILL YOU FLEE?, by Doug McKeag

Laurel Green and Serena Lee of ARM’S LENGTH interview Doug McKeag of

Doom 2012: When Will You Flee?

by Doug McKeag

Directed by Duval Lang
Presented by Dandi Productions
Featuring Doug McKeag

In DOOM 2012: When will YOU Flee?, Doug McKeag presents the evidence that our comfortable lives are about to change. Drastically. But when? When will YOU pack up the car and get outta town? When will YOU Flee? Cast your vote in this hilariously scientific, deadly serious tour-de-force.

Q: Can you tell us a little about Dandi Productions? Is DOOM 2012 a musical project (like most of your others)?

A: [DOOM 2012] is NOT a musical, but Dandi usually produces things related to music: Symphony Programs, big band concerts, jazz gigs, recordings.

Q: How did your project start?

A: Like most good things, it came out of my obsession for cutting out apocalyptic newspaper headlines.

Q: What is your process of new play development like?

Unofficially, a week in Banff, and a bag of weed… but really, I have a brain that keeps figurin’ and crunchin’, and eventually a play emerges.

Q: What are some of the questions that are on your mind these days in rehearsals?

A: “OMIGOD will this fit in under an hour?”

Q: What response have you received performing this piece?

A: The premiere run in Calgary was received very warmly, and was this week nominated for Outstanding New Play for a Betty Mitchell Award.

Betty Mitchell Award

Betty Mitchell Award

Q: How seriously do you take the prediction on which your play is based?

A: The show is very funny, but I am deadly serious. We’re in deep trouble as a species; it’s too late to fix it, so get ready.

Q: What do you hope to accomplish before the end of the world? Any lofty theatrical goals, like world domination for Dandi Productions?

A: I’m pretty happy about life, all in all, and I’m certainly no saviour, but why oh why are we sooo bad about taking care of the world and each other? So, I hope to plant a meme that spreads worldwide that encourages us to do better…or DIE.

Q: Have you converted any audience members to worrying about the end of the world after seeing your play?

A: Many. Very few leave unaffected. Angry, maybe, depressed almost certainly. The show forces you to ask yourself: when the shit hits the fan, do I look after myself, or others? Strangely enough, it’s an uncomfortable question.

Q: Do you have any hints as to how the world will end? How should we prepare?

A: The show is chock-a-block with survival hints. You gotta know WHEN to flee, WHERE to flee and WHAT to flee.

Q: Will coming to see your show help us to prepare?

A: Big time.

Q: What are you most excited about when it comes to staging/performing DOOM 2012 in Toronto at SummerWorks?

A: Well, I know how scared Calgary audiences got, so let’s see if the big city folk are any more or less resilient. I approach this show as much scientist as performer… I end up with scientific, verifiable mathematical results. That’s gold to a statistics fetishist.

TALK SIXTY TO ME, by Oonagh Duncan

Tim Welham of The Dwarf’s interviews Oonagh Duncan of

Talk Sixty To Me

by Oonagh Duncan

Oonagh Duncan

Oonagh Duncan

Directed by Philip Adams
Presented by Oyster Productions
Featuring Cayle Chernin, Bonnie McDougall, Allan Price,
Andrew Scorer

Talk Sixty To Me is a shocking and hilarious verbatim play based on over 100 hours of recorded interviews with sixty-year-olds. From CEOs to refugees, cougars and ladies who lunch, the boomers reveal the truth about sex, suicide, cyber dating, the circle of life, and the surprise of suddenly being…sixty.

If you’re thirty and looking to understand your parent’s generation, (or sixty looking to understand your own) this show is definitely not to be missed! Oonagh Duncan’s Talk Sixty to Me is exciting, adventurous and relevant theatre accessible to all ages – whether you’re thirty, sixty, or thirty plus sixty. Check it out, it’s gonna be hilarious!

Q: Describe your show in one sentence.

Talk Sixty To Me is a shocking and hilarious play based on over 100 hours of recorded interviews with Toronto -area sixty-year olds.

Q: What are the top three reasons to see Talk Sixty to Me?

1. Because every word in Talk Sixty To Me is verbatim-proving that the truth is stranger-and funnier-than fiction.

2. Because you have no idea how much you discriminated against people because of their perceived age.

3. Because Talk Sixty To Me is the much-anticipated follow up to the cult hit Talk Thirty To Me, which gained national media attention and went on to be produced in New York and London.

Q: What is the original inspiration behind the project?

I wrote Talk Thirty To Me largely to ‘explain’ our generation to our parents and when it was done, so many of those parents wanted me to ‘do one about us-do one about turning sixty’. At first I wasn’t interested at all (see reason number two to see the show: unintentional ageism!) but as soon as I started interviewing, I was absolutely fascinated to discover that sixty is nothing like I thought it was…

Q: What is the most exciting thing about documentary-style and verbatim theatre?

Because the play is only taken from words spoken in ‘real life’, the play can’t exist unless people want to talk about it. It necessarily creates theatre that is relevant to the local community.

Q: How does the show compare to Talk Thirty to Me? What are the differences?

There are actually alot of fascinating similarities – at both ages, it’s a stage of life where you take stock of who you are and what you’ve done and try to figure out ‘what’s next’. The thirty year olds hardly ever mentioned the Kennedy assassination though.

Q: What was the most challenging part of creating the piece?

Selecting the material to use! I have hundreds of pages of amazing stories and ideas and characters and I have to boil all that down to one cohesive one-hour play-it’s torture having to omit so much beautiful stuff!

Q: What should audiences come expecting to see? Are they in for any interesting surprises?

Well, the first line of the show is ‘why would anyone want to see a play about a bunch of old people?’, which is I guess the presumption that I think people might come in with. The surprise is (for all of us-even the 60 year olds), is that you always feel 20 years old and then suddenly you look down and your body tells otherwise.

Les Personnes – Jordi Mand

jordijordijordijordijordijordi hurray! she’s not only works for the festival, she plays one on t.v.!

jordi. or, as we like to joke in the office: "the one who sent in the side-ways picture of herself and we were too lazy to make it right, so it will just have to stay like this and people are going to have to turn their heads to the left. no. right. left? right. left."

1. Who are you?
Jordi Mand

2. Why are you doing here?
I am the Program Cordintor for the Festival this year.

3. What do you hope for the festival.
That it continues to surprise – surprise all of us as well as all of you

4. What are you most interested in?
Play development. Artist development…and great story telling.

5. What are you worried about?
Time, time, time.

6. Any final words?

Raising Luke, By Claire Calnan

Jane Maggs (Until June) interviews Claire Calnan and Jenny Young from:

Raising Luke

Written and Directed by Claire Calnan

Presented by tiny bird theatre
Featuring Maja Ardal, Lisa Karen Cox , Lindsay McMahon, Pierre Simpson, Camille Stubel, Jenny Young

In a world where churches are changed into condos and convents to retirement homes Martha takes her son and returns to the order where she once served. A haunting choir of bird-like nuns threaten to shake her but Martha, faced with the fear of not knowing, has decided to know.

Tell me a little about your company’s history?

In 2002 I asked Claire to be in a little show that I wrote called Chaising Krinko’s as part of Mayhem Theatre’s “Saints, Sins and Clowns” we knew each other from school but had never worked together and after this project realized that we needed to do it again.

So in 2003 we applied and were accepted for SummerWorks with Chasing Krinko’s where we had our first successful and slightly bumpy festival. From there we started producing the yearly fundraising event called “The Amazing Chase” (which was a city wide scavenger hunt/race) and began planning the future shows.
In 2005 we produced Inanna, written and directed by Claire Calnan, and enjoyed a huge success at the Toronto Fringe Festival. It was staged as an outdoor piece at Royal St George’s College and rain or shine the house was packed!

In 2005 we enjoyed another big success with The Demimonde written and directed by myself and staged in Paupers Pub Piano bar, also site specific and also a sold out hit.

Later that summer we travelled out to Victoria B.C. where we co-produced Inanna with Theatre SKAM in a huge park next to the ocean. It was a fantastic experience for both companies and for the Victoria audiences.



Since that summer we have slowed down a bit with a remount of the Demimonde at the R.O.M a workshop of Raising Luke and a name change (we used to be called Donikers Daily) and now we are super excited to be back at a festival launching a new show!

What interests you as a company and what kind of stuff would you like to be doing in the future?

“Inspired by small moments of surprise, the conundrum of human existence and the possibilities in the space around us, tiny bird creates exciting, original theatre that soars.

Working from a multi-disciplinary pallet, we invite artists from different areas of expertise to join the creation process as we work to challenge our own ideas of what makes theatre theatre. We endeavor to employ artists from across the country and to champion local, emerging talent.

We play with space. Often staging pieces in non-traditional places, we seek to engage the modern audience in innovative ways. We are where you least expect us to be.

Infused with a sense of delight and play and demanding a high level of excellence, our theatre moves people.
We are a tiny bird with a big song.”

Ok, so you work on your mandate for days and as a small company don’t get to use it often, so that, what you just read, is our mandate. And I think it sums up nicely who we are and what we are trying to do.

The future? There are a few things that we would like to do, the ball is in my court as we trade off projects and I think what excites me most at the moment is creating a show on our feet together, as Claire and I have never actually acted together before and I think that might just be a small gold mine.

What inspired the play?

My mom was a nun for seven years. She left before taking her final vows, got married and had five kids. (a friend of mine once commented that my dad stole God’s girlfriend. This is not technically true, as my mom left before she met him…but, well, whatever. details!)

A number of years ago my parents attended a reunion at the convent where my mom had served. Previously very reserved about her past she was suddenly bursting with stories and memories and had connected with a bunch of old friends. At the time I was in my mid-twenties, the same age as my mom had been when she was in the convent. I really grappled with the difference between our lives and started asking a lot of questions. I built a solo show cased on the material but I knew I wanted to return to the subject matter to examine it more as I continued to investigate my own complicated and often troubling relationship to organized religion and my mother’s faith.

What drew you to the subject of the convent and the need to return to the simpler past? (if I’m understanding…?)

The play does deal with the past but I don’t believe that it is any simpler than the present day and though we must learn from it I wouldn’t advocate any sort of ‘return’ to it. The early 1960s, the time at which some of this play is set, was a complex period for the Roman Catholic Church and the religious orders. Vatican II involved a meeting of church officials with the pope to implement major changes to the organization to reflect the changing world. The mass was translated from Latin into English and the religious habits were modified and eventually, with some exceptions, discarded. I took a trip out to Antigonish to visit the Mother House where my mom had lived many years before. I interviewed a number of the women who still served there. Having grown up in a fairly conservative environment with parents who struggled to understand their liberal children I expected the nuns to be even more extreme. I was surprised. In fact, they totally blew my mind. The women there were extremely progressive, open-minded, educated, spiritual people. Also, very funny. And patient. There were religious scholars who had written about the history and philosophy of the church, community activists who headed social service organizations, and advocates for human rights who sat on councils for the UN. Many were openly critical about their church and seemed to struggle with the pace of its progress. But they could laugh easily too. They disarmed me. If I have an opportunity, I would love to go back there. Not to the past- but to that place and those people, in the present.

What is an interesting question or thought you are posing with this piece?

I have a lot of them but here are some big ones for me: Do we lose something in a modern, secular society by divorcing ourselves from spiritual practice and tradition? What leads people to embrace fundamentalist beliefs? How can one enjoy the beauty of churches, hymns and prayers when one is conflicted about the doctrines and political practices of the organizations that manage them? How much a part of our identity are our religious beliefs? How much a part of our national identity is tied to religion and does this breed fear and intolerance towards other nations based on their national identities?

Ok, maybe some of these are just questions I had while writing…but I hope that a few of them are asked in the playing of it.

And they may sound a little lofty but the play is not. It is accessible and, I hope, entertaining.

How does Tiny Bird approach a new piece?

Claire and I trade off projects artistically while the other supports as a producer. Our pattern thus far has been that one of us has a piece that they are writing and are also interested in directing as well.
As time often limits us we tend to hit the ground running with staging and producing re-writes on the fly etc. We do try to get as many reads as possible before we start rehearsals with the final cast. And a lot of the writing process is passing the script back and forth between the two of us to create deadlines and to give notes, etc…

Claire and Jenny

Claire and Jenny

How do you work in rehearsals?

Claire has a huge background in collaborative creation and most of the plays that I work on as an actor are new plays, so we are both very comfortable with creating in the room and with the actors to see how a scene, environment or relationship will play out. We somehow always have live music/singing and some form of movement or choreography in our pieces so there is a lot of emphasis put on theatricality rather than purely on text. We like big, bold, exciting, surprising choices so we encourage the people around us to make those choices and rehearsal will follow that lead, creating with each and every one of the artists in the room.

I love entering a room where there are people moving their bodies, composing songs, working on scenes and staging. It feels very rich for me. And fun. Which is also a big part of the way we work (though not at every moment…if only…)

In regards to Raising Luke, it is a very short time period to rehearse so we will be moving through things much faster than I would normally desire, which is against my basic theories about theatre practice but…one must make do. This will be our first kick at the can. And I hope we will get to go back for another at some point. (get her up on her feet and see if she has legs to stand on, right?)

Because the writer is also the director, is the script locked or does it change and evolve quite a bit as you work?

Oh, it is changing and evolving each day. I am interested in collaborations so I am grateful that I have intelligent and brave actors who can intuit whether they are telling their own stories effectively. I will do my best to help them do that. I will also be interested in having a few trusted theatre friends come in and take a look at what we have created to see if they can follow it…

Because it’s a new piece was it written with the SummerWorks criteria in mind at all (ie time, budget constraints, simple storable set, etc or do you fit it into the SummerWorks mold after the fact?

It was not created with Summerworks in mind but we see this as a valuable first step towards developing the piece. We are a small company and we don’t love producing but we have made a habit (habit? yes. haha) of creating ambitious shows with big casts and challenging staging. The festivals make it possible for us to produce a show like this because if we were doing it independently it would take us 12 years to raise the money.

We have had to cut the script significantly to allow it to fit into the allotted time. That was the biggest sacrifice but also a valuable exercise. And we enjoy working with simple sets and exploring the magic created by the actors in the space. Jenny and I started working together because we shared that love in our approach to theatre so we are not daunted by the lack of storage space. So that’s good!
And we are excited to be a part of SummerWorks and be among so many of Toronto’s most exciting and innovative artists.

What do you find most rewarding in this type of theatre: new piece, creating from the ground up, very collaborative?

The reward is that we get to tell the story we want in a way that we found together. It is an ownership thing I guess!

I completely agree. It is a bit of a hair-raising experience at time but THE MOST REWARDING in the end.

Is this how you prefer to work?’

Claire and Jenny:
In terms of our own company, yes, so far. Though we both work most often as contracted actors for other companies, sometimes in collaborative processes and sometimes not. We have found working in a variety of forms and processes to be very fruitful, each experience helping to feed the others. So we like this way, yes, but we’re not exclusive. We have an open relationship to theatre. We’ll do just about anything we find interesting or attractive, anything that may help us to grow.

PELEE, by Erin Brandenburg and Lauren Taylor

Talya Rubin (girl with no hands) interviews Erin Brandenburg from:


by Erin Brandenburg and Lauren Taylor

Erin Brandenberg and Andrew Penner

Erin Brandenburg and Andrew Penner

Directed by Lauren Taylor
Presented by The Pelee Project
Featuring Gord Bolan, Erin Brandenburg, Dave McEathron, Andrew Penner, Howie Shia

From the company that brought you last year’s Fringe hit REESOR (‘NNNN’ Critic’s pick, Best Overall Production) comes PELEE, an exciting new production combining animation, electric power, failed inventions, and original live music performed on fantastical instrumental creations. PELEE examines the mysteries of the past and value of forgotten places

After their Fringe hit, Reesor, the collective led by Erin Brandenburg and Lauren Taylor are coming to Summerworks with their latest adventure in eclectic theater-making magic; Pelee. Exploring the history of Pelee Island through music, animation, and a variety of other storytelling devices, expect to be entertained and awed by this original piece. I had the pleasure of exchanging emails with Erin Brandenburg and probing a little deeper beneath the surface of all things Pelee. Here’s what she had to say…

1. How did your collective come together?

Lauren and I met at work, and Andrew was just always hanging around the house while we were working, and then we needed some musicians and instruments so we got Gord and Dave and Iner, and then Howie came along . . . We’re just really lucky to have a lot of really talented friends.

Lauren Taylor

Lauren Taylor

2. Why do both the plays you have made have two ‘e’s in their titles?

We like vowels.

3. What inspires your work and sparks the research?

Crazy historical events that many people don’t know about. We find strange details in history really exciting. For this show we began with some local history about Southern Ontario and found some fascinating characters and events. It’s also personal stories, and personal experiences. Pelee Island is one of my favourite places in Canada and it was a delight to learn more about it.

4. What is your process like?

Because we are the writers as well as the director and performer our writing method involves a lot of work on our feet. We start with research, gathering as much information and tiny details as we can on our subjects and then just start experimenting. For this project we got our collaborators together very early in the process and their input was extremely valuable.

5. Do the multimedia aspects in your work come from who you are as a collective or do you find the musicians, animators, etc…once you know what you need?

We start with the people we like and want to work with and get everyone together in a room and say ‘go!’ it’s very chaotic, but each medium feeds into the others. The inspiration for much of the story of Pelee came from Iner Souster’s pieces of art that are lying around my house and from the music that Gord, Andrew and Dave create together.

The Microphone of Pasts Future (Iner Souster)

The Microphone of Pasts Future (created by Iner Souster)

6. What is the most obscure thing you discovered about Pelee island?

There were pirates.

7. What is the most embarrassing moment of collective creation that we won’t see on stage?

Hmmm, what happens in rehearsal stays in rehearsal.

8. How would you describe your sensibility in terms of the “stage magic” or theatricality of you pieces?

It’s the same kind of magic that you had when you were putting on plays in your parents basement, as a kid. We use simple design ideas, and because we work very collaboratively the design, and music are integrated into the story.

9. How would you put your latest work in relation to your Fringe hit, Reesor?

Like Reesor, this show has a live band on stage and deals with an obscure part of Canadian history. But where Reesor was accoustic and Mennonite, this is electric and a lot more kooky.

10. We are outsiders to the Toronto theatre scene. If you had one sentence to orient us, what would it be?

Go to the beer tent.

Well, that’s where you’ll find me after the show then! I am thoroughly looking forward to seeing this. I was particularly captivated by the notion of a play being as playful as basement theatre when we were kids and love that they are experimenting with simple, yet unusual ways of making theatre come to life.

Until June, by Jane Maggs

Until June

by Jane Maggs

Directed by Tanner Harvey
Presented by East of Reason Theatre
Featuring Jane Maggs and Susan Kent

“I used to wake up screaming. And that just wasn’t enough anymore”. Meet Lily: a girl with an ever-present past and a present on loop, who’s committed an extremely desperate act in attempt to affect the future. A strawberry-blonde-black comedy about manipulation, responsibility, and the wrong way to get out of a rut.


I have heard good things about this company and about the artists involved and for a show is “a strawberry-blonde-black comedy about manipulation, responsibility and the wrong way to get out of a rut” sounds like an adventure worth going on.
Please read on for my interview with Jane Maggs of East Of Reason Theatre and their production of Until June

Jane Maggs

Jane Maggs

What inspired you to write this piece?

I find the idea of ‘how we come to know the things we know’ interesting. Where do our facts and beliefs come from? And once we trace back to where they came from and who they came from does that make them seem more difficult to see as impenetrable fact. To be honest I had a thought one day about how I know you are not supposed to wear black and brown together and all of a sudden it dawned on me that this was something someone has once said to me. It wasn’t fact at all. And for me, I had just always believed things like rocks are hard, winter is cold, you don’t wear black and brown together… And I know this is a frivolous thing but it just got me thinking about how someone can live their life totally based on the mantra of another human. Cause I’m a human and I never think anyone listens to anything I have to say. And if I found out they did, I would be shocked and terrified for them. Cause at least I take my own thoughts with a grain of salt… you know? And this belief was told to me by a 16 year old girl (and I didn’t even connect that until I stopped to think about it for a second). So that got me thinking about whose responsibility this kind of influence is, the listener or the talker? And what if someone did base their life around someone’s not-well-thought-out comments and then was horribly betrayed when the talker grew up and didn’t believe those things anymore. And the story grew from there and that idea became a layer among other layers but it was certainly the root thought.

Is this piece biographical in anyway? If so how?

Not really. Only in the way that it’s all about what affects me, and hopefully others, but it starts with what affects me because why else would I write it? And things that affect me, ideas that I find interesting come from somewhere inside and then you apply them in foreign situations and watch what happens. Right?

What do you hope the experience will be like for audience members?

I hope that people laugh while they are watching something that they know is being presented in a comic way but isn’t a comic story. It also isn’t a tragic story. It’s someone’s life that is comic and tragic and hilarious and disastrous and darkly intriguing in the span of a day. Like all our lives. I hope they will relate to the story.

What are you most excited about when it comes to staging the piece?

The structure is a huge part of it. I’m interested to see how that translates. The structure is like the editor on a film in that he/she is manipulating what you see when and what you find out and how much, by the choices he/she makes, and who he/she focuses on when. And in order to understand the story and the main character Lily, you have to follow why things happen when they do because what you see comes from her head and so why are we seeing this now and where does it fit in with what we saw previously. So the structure itself becomes another clue, another way in to the story. And there is a car that reverses on stage and bangs into a tree so there are film scenes mixed in there that I have been in denial about. I’m interested to see how someone else gets me out of those messes.

Who is in the cast? (tell me a little bit about them)

An amazing beyond words actor, Susan Kent. She is a tall dark haired knockout from Newfoundland. She is the funniest woman alive, and without overselling her, she can do anything onstage and breaks hearts all over the world. She has been acting for a long long time, does it all: comedy, sings, theatre, was a series regular on a TV show, lead in a feature, all. She is currently performing a solo show that she wrote called Nan Loves Jerry in the fringe. It’s flawless. So she’s alright. I, myself, am in it. I am shorter than her. In most respects. And there is a mystery man.

Susan Kent (as Jerry, from her one-woman show, "Nan Loves Jerry")

Susan Kent (as Jerry, from her one-woman show, "Nan Loves Jerry")

Do you see this piece having a life past SummerWorks?

I definitely hope so. With the 60 minute time constraint it really asks you to focus on the core of your story, which has been so valuable and I would love the freedom to flesh a few things out down the road. Also it’s a story that has come to mean so much to me. I am not finished with it, exploring it, etc. And because it is my whole focus right now it feels like the only story I have to tell, which I think is probably not true but not a bad place to be while immersed.

If you had all the funding you could imagine would it change how you have written or staged Until June ? (please expand)

Hire a producer. I have to do everything twice and everything is twice as hard because I am a bad producer. But no. It wouldn’t change how I have written. I felt very free in the writing and believe that anything you write can be done. So if I write a car reversing on stage and hitting a tree that will happen. With a lot of money you get the real deal, with less money you get the ‘creative’ deal. I like either myself.

What other writing have you done in the past?

I wrote a solo show that I workshopped and presented with Resource Centre for the Arts (LSPU Hall) in St John’s, NL. Then I moved here and was mostly perusing acting. East of Reason (our theatre company) had a show in Summerworks last year and being in the festival and seeing all the great work really inspired me to start writing more. I submitted a version of Until June to the Banff Playwright’s Colony and was accepted for this past spring and being there, surrounded by people I shouldn’t even be able to be in the same room with and hear them speak and hear their work was such an inspiring and awakening experience. This is all I want to do now. All. And partly because I love the experience I am having, and the way a good day of writing makes me feel and partly because I just want a reason to go and live in Banff for a couple of weeks again. I am working as a writer for a television production company working on a TV show in development as well.

What else has East of Reason produced?

We produced the ecstatics by Ruth Madoc Jones and Erika Hennebury in Summerworks last year and had previously produced it in Newfoundland both on the east and west coasts. We are a young spry company.

With theatre becoming more and more challenging to fund and to find audiences what keeps you doing it?

That maybe. The audience thing. It’s a part of it at least. I have always been so affected by theatre, from when I was a little girl. It has the ability to make you feel so full and alive and makes you think and relate with and to strangers, and I believe it’s so important in a world that consists of such routine (of work, TV on DVD and then bed). People get lazy (I include myself here) and it’s so much easier to sit at home and watch a movie than a piece of theatre. I think people compare the two and think: theatre is less entertaining and less accessible. I keep doing it because I think they are wrong. Theatre doesn’t have to be alienating and can still make you think, and this is a more rewarding experience, when you are asked to use your brain to contribute to your own entertainment.

And I’m not saying film doesn’t do this, depending on the film, it just doesn’t get such a bad rap. For theatre to remain true to itself and continue to be the art that it always has been doesn’t mean it can’t be a fucking great time. And so I want to prove this right. And I want to add to the great, super intelligent and to die for theatre that goes on in our community. And on a bigger level I believe so strongly that it’s important to keep it alive in our society that it comes back to if you aren’t part of the solution you are part of the problem.

A show that sounds like it will no doubt leave you with lots of laughs and an exciting look at story structure and what we all take for granted in life! I can’t wait to see it.